If Megan was dead, Tory Lanez wouldn’t be in prison
 |
| Megan Thee Stallion Says She Was Shot In the Foot, LAPD didn't know she was a victim |
Disclaimer: This article is based on publicly available information and personal analysis. It reflects opinions, not definitive facts, and is not intended to defame or mislead. Readers should refer to official court records and verified reports for accuracy. Any errors are unintentional and subject to correction.
If Megan Thee Stallion were dead, Tory Lanez would be a free man.
Not because dead women tell no tales. There were plenty of witnesses telling plenty of tales, many of those tales contradicting Megan. But because, had this been a murder case, prosecutors would have had to rely on evidence alone. And the evidence, whether you think Tory is guilty or not, simply was not strong enough for a conviction.
Consider Casey Anthony. She allegedly, but undoubtedly, murdered her daughter. Little Caylee was decomposing in the trunk of her car. Her mother found the body. Casey showed zero remorse during the trial, more annoyed by her friends' tears than her daughter's death. Yet she walks free today, celebrated by the left as a feminist LGBT activist.
Yes, you read that correctly. A baby killer is now a progressive icon on Substack. Though why conservatives act shocked is beyond me, the left has made defending infanticide their brand. Doesn't matter if the baby's inside or outside the womb, just matters that mommy decided she's "done with this" and wants it eliminated.
But why was Casey free? Despite overwhelming evidence and public certainty of her guilt, there simply was not enough for a conviction. Think about it. A child murderer walks free while Tory sits in prison. Even Megan's delusional fans must concede that murdering a child is worse than allegedly shooting a grown woman's feet. It was not the severity that got Casey off. That was a devastating case. It was the lack of evidence and a dead victim.
Same with O. J. Simpson. Had Nicole survived that stabbing and gone partying two weeks later, then exposed O. J., he would be in prison whether the glove fit or not. All evidence, however weak or stupid, would have stacked under the most powerful evidence of all: the victim's testimony.
So once again, it does not really matter if the public thinks Tory did it. Most people thought O. J. did it too. The question is whether there was enough evidence for a conviction. There was not.
This case was based on the "victim's" words. Victims can be wrong. Or liars. Megan could be a victim of stepping on glass, being shot directly, or being hit with shrapnel. She has claimed all three, backtracking on the first two. But that does not matter once there is evidence of gunfire and injury. All eyes turn to the injured party. All trust flows their way.
This would be fine if not for the exhausting list of inconsistencies that should not even be inconsistencies, and her fans excusing it with, "Well, that's none of your business. She said she was shot."
News flash for feminist activists pretending to enjoy Megan's music the same way Cardi B fans pretend Cardi B is not monstrously hideous: nothing is private once crimes are involved. When investigating a shooting, they do not locate the nearest woman for the story and slam the gavel. They question everyone about everything, down to last night's dinner menu. They are looking for consistency.
Who anyone sleeps with is not anyone's business until you accuse them of shooting you. Now we want to know. What relationship did you have with the alleged shooter? Where were you hit? What were you hit with? Does the evidence match your story?
In Megan's case, almost nothing matches anything. She lied about her relationship with the alleged shooter. We cannot determine whether she was hit in one foot, the left foot, the right foot, or both. First, she said it was glass. Then, she claimed it was bullets, once she decided he had shot her.
Later, it became fragments or shrapnel, once she realized bullets do not dissolve after entering the body. They are extracted and must be provided as evidence. So now, it is no longer bullets, it is fragments.
Then, drum roll... the fragments disappeared, according to the detective!
Kelsey mysteriously got immunity. An eyewitness saw two women fighting, one returning to the car, and shots coming from the female first before a struggle. The bodyguard tells a similar story. Tory was not the shooter. Kelsey was. The struggle was Tory trying to stop her. Tory's DNA was not on the magazine, and was inconclusive on the gun.
Virtually all evidence either contradicts Megan OR is insufficient.
So, this entire conviction rests on Megan's word. And if you have followed this case even slightly, you know those words are not exactly reliable. And Megan's fans know the evidence is not there, and that this rests on her words. If they had unquestionable proof, they would plaster it everywhere the minute anyone questions the case, which is every minute.
They will camp in your mentions for hours but cannot produce a single piece of evidence to make their time useful. So time is not really their issue. Their entire argument is, "He was found guilty." Not how. Not what evidence. Just the verdict as evidence of the verdict.
Or they play the "You hate Black women" card. Alright then. If believing Tory means you hate Black women, then believing Megan means you hate Black men. See how clinically retarded that sounds?
They cannot provide evidence because the decision was not based on a smoking gun. It was based on Megan's words. And as excruciatingly stupid as her fans are, even they will not argue that Tory did it "because Megan said so," since Megan is a known pathological liar. So instead, they cry, "You hate Black women," using the same tactic white women use when they cry misogyny. Only this time, it's framed as both misogyny and racism. The implication is that you must believe her because she is a woman, and if you do not, it must be because she is a woman. In other words, it is literally "believe all women."
Let me be very clear, I don't hate people with vaginas or penises. I do hate people who make taking dick or their vaginas their entire personality, career, and lyrical content, then claim someone shot them with an extraordinarily implausible sequence of events. Then when asked about their sexual history with the alleged shooter, to establish the full story, they lie. Suddenly they're Victorian prudes whose sex life is sacred and private, which is why they had to lie about it.
The same woman who rapped about her WAP in gynecological detail is now offended by a simple yes-or-no question about whether she slept with her alleged shooter? Nobody's asking for a Yelp review of Tory's bedroom performance, they're asking if it happened.
You wouldn't be entitled to that privacy anyway. Not when you're sending someone to prison. Not when you're the key witness in a criminal case.
I do hate liars. And if that liar happens to be a Black woman, you are going to have to handcuff me to the "you hate Black women" jail, because I will not pretend the sky is not blue just because a Black woman, or a white woman, or a purple woman says it isn't.
Free Tory Lanez.
Reader Comments